Continuing the discussion from Support for new Bluetooth-enabled timers:
I appreciate all your efforts. One quick question.
Does this change anything? Looks like they have launched a public API.
If nothing else they seem to be inviting you to the conversation.
Note: I am saving any commentary for why they didn’t do that here.
In any case there will be a nice public discussion over there if your willing to take another stab at it.
I’ll ask people in charge of priorities…
Personally I’m still puzzled what have been stoping them to communicate with us and why exactly we needed any kind of invitation?
Want to see SG Timers in PractiScore?
So do we !
If they really wanted that why haven’t they contacted us?
After all they are the ones selling their timers to you and yet PractiScore is somehow at fault for not providing a free integration of their devices to their customers.
Using social media as a communication medium for an engineering project is somewhat ridiculous and looks more like marketing stunt then the real care for their own customers.
